[ PROMPT_NODE_24559 ]
Command Creator – Patterns
[ SKILL_DOCUMENTATION ]
# Command Patterns
This document describes the common patterns for slash commands, helping you choose the right structure for your workflow.
## Pattern Categories
### 1. Workflow Automation Pattern
**Structure:** Analyze → Act → Report
**When to use:**
- Multi-step workflows with clear sequence
- Commands that need to analyze before acting
- Workflows that produce specific outputs (commits, PRs, reports)
**Example workflow:**
1. Check for context files (e.g., `.PLAN.md`)
2. Analyze current state (git status, file changes)
3. Perform actions (create commit, submit PR)
4. Report results to user
**Key features:**
- Explicit file check order
- Conditional logic based on file existence
- Clear success output format
- Context-aware decision making
**Pattern example:**
```markdown
1. Check for .PLAN.md in repository root
- If exists: use plan context for commit message
- If not: analyze git changes and draft message
2. Review git status and diff
- Identify staged and unstaged changes
- Determine scope of changes
3. Create commit with descriptive message
- Follow repository's commit message style
- Include co-author attribution
4. Submit PRs with Graphite
- Use gt stack submit
- Report PR URLs to user
```
### 2. Iterative Fixing Pattern
**Structure:** Run → Parse → Fix → Repeat
**When to use:**
- Commands that fix issues iteratively (linting, tests, CI)
- Workflows that need multiple attempts to succeed
- Tasks with clear pass/fail criteria
**Example workflow:**
1. Run check command (e.g., `make all-ci`)
2. Parse failures by type
3. Apply targeted fixes
4. Run check again to verify
5. Repeat until success or max iterations reached
**Key features:**
- Iteration control (max attempts, stuck detection)
- Progress tracking with TodoWrite
- Clear stopping conditions
- Categorization of failure types
- Incremental fix application
**Pattern example:**
```markdown
1. Run make all-ci (max 10 iterations)
2. If check fails:
- Parse error output by category (pyright, ruff, tests)
- Create todos for each error category
- Apply fixes for each category sequentially
- Mark todo complete after fixing each category
3. After each fix iteration:
- Run make all-ci again
- Check if new errors appeared
- If stuck (same errors 2+ times): stop and report
4. Stop when:
- All checks pass (exit code 0)
- Max iterations reached
- Detected stuck state
```
### 3. Agent Delegation Pattern
**Structure:** Context → Delegate → Iterate
**When to use:**
- Complex tasks requiring specialized agents
- Multi-phase workflows with human review
- Tasks that benefit from agent specialization
**Example workflow:**
1. Present planning context to user
2. Invoke specialized agent (via Task tool)
3. Agent creates plan/output iteratively
4. Plan is reviewed and refined by user
5. Save results to disk after approval
**Key features:**
- Clear agent invocation instructions
- Phase-based workflow (planning → review → execution)
- Explicit save-to-disk trigger
- User review checkpoints
- Context gathering before delegation
**Pattern example:**
```markdown
1. Present planning context
- Explain what the agent will do
- Set expectations for iterative process
- Mention that user can refine the output
2. Invoke subagent agent
- Use Task tool with subagent_type="subagent"
- Pass task description and context
- Do NOT attempt to write plan yourself
3. Agent works autonomously
- Creates initial plan
- Iterates with user feedback
- Refines based on questions/concerns
4. After user approves plan
- Save to .PLAN.md
- Confirm location with user
- Explain next steps (execution)
```
### 4. Simple Execution Pattern
**Structure:** Parse Arguments → Execute → Return Output
**When to use:**
- Single-step commands with arguments
- Wrapper commands for existing tools
- Commands that simply run and report
**Example workflow:**
1. Parse command arguments
2. Run specific command or script with arguments
3. Handle and display output
4. Report success or failure
**Key features:**
- Argument handling (required vs optional)
- Direct tool invocation
- Minimal logic
- Output formatting
**Pattern example:**
```markdown
1. Parse [base-branch] argument
- If provided: use specified branch
- If not provided: use main/master
2. Run codex-review script
- Pass base-branch to script
- Capture output
3. Display results
- Show review findings
- Report issues found
- Suggest fixes if applicable
```
## Advanced Patterns
### Multi-Agent Orchestration
**When to use:** Complex workflows requiring multiple specialized agents in sequence
**Pattern:**
```markdown
1. Use Task tool with subagent_type="Explore" to find relevant files
- Search for specific patterns
- Identify key components
2. Use Task tool with subagent_type="subagent" to create plan
- Pass context from exploration
- Generate detailed implementation plan
- Review with user
3. Execute the plan directly in the main conversation
- Load plan from .PLAN.md
- Use TodoWrite to track phases
- Execute steps systematically
- Report completion
```
### Context File Priority Checks
**When to use:** Commands that can operate in different modes based on available context
**Pattern:**
```markdown
Check these files in order for context:
1. .PLAN.md - implementation plan (highest priority)
2. .github/CONTRIBUTING.md - contribution guidelines
3. AGENTS.md - coding standards
4. README.md - project overview
Use the first file found to inform the workflow. Different files trigger different behaviors.
```
### Conditional Tool Selection
**When to use:** Commands that choose tools/approach based on task complexity
**Pattern:**
```markdown
Analyze scope of changes:
If changes span 3+ files OR involve new abstractions:
- Use subagent agent
- Create detailed plan
- Execute with subagent
Otherwise:
- Execute changes directly
- Use simpler workflow
- Skip planning overhead
```
### Makefile Integration Pattern
**When to use:** Commands that need to run make targets
**Pattern:**
```markdown
**IMPORTANT:** Always use Bash tool for pytest/pyright/ruff/prettier/make/gt commands
1. Use Bash tool directly
- Run commands like: "make all-ci", "pytest tests/", "pyright", etc.
- Bash tool will execute and return output
2. Process command results
- Check exit code
- Parse any errors
- Apply fixes if needed
```
### Progressive Disclosure Pattern
**When to use:** Commands that start simple but can get more complex based on results
**Pattern:**
```markdown
1. Start with minimal check
- Run basic validation
- Identify if deeper work needed
2. If issues found:
- Expand scope progressively
- Add todos for each issue category
- Handle incrementally
3. Only go deeper if necessary
- Don't over-analyze upfront
- Let results guide next steps
- Stop when criteria met
```
## Pattern Selection Guide
| If the command needs to... | Use this pattern |
| --------------------------------------- | -------------------------- |
| Create commits/PRs based on analysis | Workflow Automation |
| Fix issues iteratively until passing | Iterative Fixing |
| Create plans or delegate to specialists | Agent Delegation |
| Run a tool and display results | Simple Execution |
| Coordinate multiple agents | Multi-Agent Orchestration |
| Check multiple context files | Context File Priority |
| Choose approach based on complexity | Conditional Tool Selection |
| Run make targets | Makefile Integration |
| Start simple and expand as needed | Progressive Disclosure |
## Combining Patterns
Commands often combine multiple patterns. For example:
**submit-stack combines:**
- Context File Priority (check .PLAN.md)
- Workflow Automation (analyze → commit → submit)
- Conditional Tool Selection (use plan if exists)
**ensure-ci combines:**
- Iterative Fixing (run → fix → repeat)
- Makefile Integration (use makefile-runner)
- Progressive Disclosure (expand todos as issues found)
## Writing Pattern-Specific Instructions
When implementing a pattern, include these elements:
### For All Patterns
- Clear sequence of steps (numbered)
- Expected outcomes at each step
- Error handling approach
- Success criteria
### Pattern-Specific Elements
**Workflow Automation:**
- File checks before analysis
- Conditional branches
- Output format specifications
**Iterative Fixing:**
- Max iteration count
- Stuck detection logic
- Progress tracking requirements
- Per-category fix instructions
**Agent Delegation:**
- Exact Task tool invocation syntax
- Context to pass to agent
- User review checkpoints
- Save-to-disk instructions
**Simple Execution:**
- Argument parsing logic
- Command invocation syntax
- Output formatting requirements
Source: claude-code-templates (MIT). See About Us for full credits.